Reality Check Logo Reality Check Box Hackathon 2026
1 / 6
Slide 1 · The Problem · 15 Seconds

Identify risks before making customer commitments

The Fragmented Manual Process
Draft customer
commitment
→
Search
scattered docs
→
Ask
product team
→
Follow up
with ops
→
Piece together
answers
→
Assess risk
manually

The Gap: Sales teams make commitments on features, delivery deadlines, and performance without fast access to reliable delivery information. Risks go unnoticed until after the promise is made.

Running Example: Enterprise Amazon S3 Archive Migration Fixed Severities: High · Medium · None
Slide 2 · Architecture · 10 Seconds

One contract in. An evidence-backed review out.

Grounding Contract Promises in Verified Box Ground Truth
1. Inputs to Agent

📄 One Draft Sales Contract

Box Ground Truth:
• B1: Approved product docs
• B2: Roadmap & release plans
• B3: Delivery reviews & closeouts
➔
Reality Check
Automated contract risk review engine
Claude on Amazon Bedrock
➔
2. Outputs to Field

💬 Comments on each claim right on the contract in Box

📊 One-page Risk Report PDF saved to Box reports folder

Salesperson sees the evidence where they work. Human makes the commitment call.
Slide 3 · Decision Model · 10 Seconds

A simple decision for every claim

Deterministic Severity Rules Fixed in Code — Never LLM Guesswork
Contract Claim
↓
Source found in Box?
[ NO ]
[ YES ]
No source found in Box HIGH
Does claim match source?
[ YES ]
[ NO ]
Supported by evidence NO RISK
Feature availability HIGH
Delivery deadline HIGH
Performance commitment MEDIUM
* Missing source does not prove claim is false — flags that it is unverified in Box records.
Slide 4 · Live Demo · 2 Minutes

Live demo: five claims, one review

“What risks should sales see before committing?”
Proposed Commitment Cited Box Evidence Agent Verdict Severity
§1 Encryption at rest in agreed config B1 Approved Solution Guide confirms support No risk NONE
§2 Smart Archive Search at launch B2 Roadmap lists as Exploratory (no ship date) Feature availability risk HIGH
§3 Migration within 30 days B3 Comparable 400–800 TB took 58–72 days Delivery deadline risk HIGH
§4 10 GB/s sustained throughput B1 Benchmark validates 5 GB/s in agreed setup Performance commitment risk MEDIUM
§5 Direct import from LegacyVault No source found across Box evidence corpus No source found HIGH
Live Hosted Web Demo & Canary Available
Lambda Function URL · Zero idle cost · Graviton2 arm64
Presenter notes contain the 0:00–2:00 timed walkthrough (press P).
Slide 5 · Value · 15 Seconds

Three benefits

Immediate Intended Value for Sales & Delivery Teams
1

Identify risks before committing

Surface unsupported features, unrealistic delivery deadlines, and unbenchmarked performance commitments before the customer signature.

2

Make informed commitments

Arm field teams with source-backed evidence, owner dates, and comparable project histories for every proposed claim.

3

Reduce manual checking

Spend less time searching scattered folders and chasing product and operations teams for ad hoc answers.

Grounded in verifiable company ground truth in Box.
Slide 6 · Vision · 10 Seconds

Three future enhancements

Natural Product Expansions Beyond V1 Scope
A

Suggested wording

Propose contract language and safe fallback terms supported directly by the verified Box evidence.

B

Owner approvals

Automatically route flagged exceptions to product or operations owners for expedited exception sign-off.

C

Continuous rechecks

Continuously re-evaluate draft agreements when roadmaps, benchmark test figures, or capabilities update.

* Clearly labeled as future enhancements, separate from the core contract-review engine.