✔ PASS
Temporal & Time-Series
task_007_Q07_scd2_open_ended_intervals
Scaled: 1M+ Records
Ordered: Yes
Slowly Changing Dimension Type 2 Join with Open-Ended Future
Candidate Latency (1M Rows)
0.44 ms
(1.1x slower than golden)
Golden Latency (1M Rows)
0.39 ms
DuckDB in-memory engine
Underlying Data Volume
1,000,002 rows
26.7 MiB across 2 tables
Evaluated Model
gemini-3.8-flash-low
Gen Latency: 7.3s
✔ Correctness Verified on 1M+ Records
Candidate SQL output matches ground truth golden query across all multiset rows and numeric tolerances (tol=1e-3). Zero data skew or anti-patterns detected on full dataset scale.
1. Analytical Significance & What It Means
Scenario & Frontier TrapBusiness Scenario & Problem
Customers change addresses or account tiers over time. Joining historical orders to customer profile dimensions requires matching the order date to the active validity interval.
⚡ The Frontier Trap (Why LLMs Fail)
Current active records typically have `valid_to IS NULL`. A simple `order_date BETWEEN valid_from AND valid_to` drops all current active records.
Prompt / User Request Given to Model
Customers change addresses or account tiers over time. Joining historical orders to customer profile dimensions requires matching the order date to the active validity interval. Execute the required analytical SQL calculation in DuckDB. Expected output columns: order_id, customer_id, order_date, amount, customer_tier_at_purchase. Results should be ordered as specified.
2. Underlying Tables, Row Counts & Data Volume
2 Tables (1,000,002 rows • 26.7 MiB)Production-scale fixtures loaded into the isolated DuckDB sandbox with at least 1,000,000 records per table:
📊 dim_customer_scd
2 rows
64 B Data Volume
customer_id (INTEGER) tier (VARCHAR) valid_from (DATE) valid_to (DATE)Data Preview (showing sample rows from 2 total rows):
| # | customer_id | tier | valid_from | valid_to |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 88 | Silver | 2026-01-01 00:00:00 | 2026-02-01 00:00:00 |
| 2 | 88 | Gold | 2026-02-01 00:00:00 | NULL |
📊 fact_orders
1,000,000 rows
26.7 MiB Data Volume
order_id (INTEGER) customer_id (INTEGER) order_date (DATE) amount (DECIMAL(10,2))Data Preview (showing sample rows from 1,000,000 total rows):
| # | order_id | customer_id | order_date | amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 88 | 2026-01-15 00:00:00 | 100 |
| 2 | 2 | 88 | 2026-02-20 00:00:00 | 250 |
| 3 | 2 | 88 | 2026-01-01 00:00:00 | 263.83 |
| 4 | 3 | 89 | 2026-01-02 00:00:00 | 245.46 |
| 5 | 4 | 90 | 2026-01-03 00:00:00 | 79.25 |
| 6 | 5 | 91 | 2026-01-04 00:00:00 | 75.66 |
| 7 | 6 | 92 | 2026-01-05 00:00:00 | 210.48 |
| 8 | 7 | 93 | 2026-01-06 00:00:00 | 221.45 |
| 9 | 8 | 94 | 2026-01-07 00:00:00 | 120.12 |
| 10 | 9 | 95 | 2026-01-08 00:00:00 | 98.98 |
| 11 | 10 | 96 | 2026-01-09 00:00:00 | 109.26 |
| 12 | 11 | 97 | 2026-01-10 00:00:00 | 157.07 |
| 13 | 12 | 98 | 2026-01-11 00:00:00 | 261.5 |
| 14 | 13 | 99 | 2026-01-12 00:00:00 | 281.48 |
| 15 | 14 | 100 | 2026-01-13 00:00:00 | 155.79 |
3. Graphical Query Execution Plan & Cost Bottlenecks
Physical Operator Tree (DuckDB 2.0 Profiler)Visual flowchart of the physical execution pipeline. Operators with high relative costs (≥ 20% of query runtime or heavy latency) are visually highlighted:
0.8%
Latency: 0.00 ms
Rows In/Out: 3
Data Vol: 108 B
📁 Projections: ['#0', 'CAST(#1 AS ...
33.6%
Latency: 0.15 ms
Rows In/Out: 3
Data Vol: 75 B
5.0%
Latency: 0.02 ms
Rows In/Out: 3
Data Vol: 75 B
📁 Projections: ['#0', 'CAST(#1 AS ...
0.3%
Latency: 0.00 ms
Rows In/Out: 3
Data Vol: 108 B
📁 Projections: ['order_id', 'custo...
38.8%
Latency: 0.17 ms
Rows In/Out: 3
Data Vol: 108 B
18.5%
Latency: 0.08 ms
Rows In/Out: 3
Data Vol: 60 B
📁 memory.main.fact_orders
3.1%
Latency: 0.01 ms
Rows In/Out: 2
Data Vol: 312 B
📁 memory.main.dim_customer_scd
| Operator | Cost % | Latency | Processed Rows | Data Volume | Details / Table | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HASH_JOIN | 38.8% | 0.17 ms | 3 | 0.00 MB | - | Normal |
| ORDER_BY | 33.6% | 0.15 ms | 3 | 0.00 MB | - | Normal |
| TABLE_SCAN | 18.5% | 0.08 ms | 3 | 0.00 MB | memory.main.fact_orders | Normal |
| PROJECTION | 5.0% | 0.02 ms | 3 | 0.00 MB | Projections: ['#0', 'CAST(#1 AS TINYINT)', '#2', | Normal |
| TABLE_SCAN | 3.1% | 0.01 ms | 2 | 0.00 MB | memory.main.dim_customer_scd | Normal |
| PROJECTION | 0.8% | 0.00 ms | 3 | 0.00 MB | Projections: ['#0', 'CAST(#1 AS INTEGER)', '#2', | Normal |
| PROJECTION | 0.3% | 0.00 ms | 3 | 0.00 MB | Projections: ['order_id', 'customer_id', 'order_ | Normal |
4. Queries Executed (Candidate vs Golden Ground Truth)
Beautified & Syntax HighlightedSELECT fo.order_id,
fo.customer_id,
fo.order_date,
fo.amount,
c.tier AS customer_tier_at_purchase
FROM fact_orders fo
JOIN dim_customer_scd c ON fo.customer_id = c.customer_id
AND fo.order_date >= c.valid_from
AND (fo.order_date < c.valid_to
OR c.valid_to IS NULL)
ORDER BY fo.order_id;
-- Join fact orders to historical customer dimension without dropping active records
SELECT o.order_id,
o.customer_id,
o.order_date,
o.amount,
c.tier AS customer_tier_at_purchase
FROM fact_orders o
JOIN dim_customer_scd c ON o.customer_id = c.customer_id
AND o.order_date >= c.valid_from
AND o.order_date < coalesce(c.valid_to, DATE '9999-12-31')
ORDER BY o.order_id;
CREATE TABLE dim_customer_scd (customer_id INT, tier VARCHAR, valid_from DATE, valid_to DATE);
CREATE TABLE fact_orders (order_id INT, customer_id INT, order_date DATE, amount decimal(10, 2));
INSERT INTO dim_customer_scd
VALUES (88, 'Silver', '2026-01-01', '2026-02-01'),
(88, 'Gold', '2026-02-01', NULL);
INSERT INTO fact_orders
VALUES (1, 88, '2026-01-15', 100.00),
(2, 88, '2026-02-20', 250.00);
5. Query Results & Expected Ground Truth
Tabular Comparison
Actual Candidate Output
(3 rows × 5 cols)
| # | order_id | customer_id | order_date | amount | customer_tier_at_purchase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 88 | 2026-01-15 00:00:00 | 100 | Silver |
| 2 | 2 | 88 | 2026-02-20 00:00:00 | 250 | Gold |
| 3 | 2 | 88 | 2026-01-01 00:00:00 | 263.83 | Silver |
Expected Golden Output
(3 rows × 5 cols)
| # | order_id | customer_id | order_date | amount | customer_tier_at_purchase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 88 | 2026-01-15 00:00:00 | 100 | Silver |
| 2 | 2 | 88 | 2026-02-20 00:00:00 | 250 | Gold |
| 3 | 2 | 88 | 2026-01-01 00:00:00 | 263.83 | Silver |