✔ PASS Temporal & Time-Series task_117_bitemporal_retroactive_audit Scaled: 1M+ Records Ordered: Yes

Bitemporal Auditing: Retroactive Policy Revision Point-in-Time State

Candidate Latency (1M Rows)
0.13 ms
(1.2x slower than golden)
Golden Latency (1M Rows)
0.11 ms
DuckDB in-memory engine
Underlying Data Volume
1,000,000 rows
45.8 MiB across 1 table
Evaluated Model
gemini-3.8-flash-low
Gen Latency: 4.5s
✔ Correctness Verified on 1M+ Records
Candidate SQL output matches ground truth golden query across all multiset rows and numeric tolerances (tol=1e-3). Zero data skew or anti-patterns detected on full dataset scale.

1. Analytical Significance & What It Means

Scenario & Frontier Trap
Business Scenario & Problem

Reconstructs historical corporate insurance coverage on an effective business date, as known to the system on an audit date prior to a retroactive backdated modification.

⚡ The Frontier Trap (Why LLMs Fail)

Frontier models ignore the second time dimension (system transaction time) and only filter on valid_from / valid_to. This incorrectly matches the retroactive modification ($500), which was not entered into the database until May 1st, failing regulatory compliance auditing.

Prompt / User Request Given to Model
Determine customer 501's insurance deductible:
1. Effective as of business date: 2026-04-10
2. As known by the system on system audit date: 2026-04-15 (strictly BEFORE the retroactive update entered into the database on 2026-05-01).

Required output columns:
- customer_id (INT)
- active_deductible (DECIMAL)

Order by customer_id ASC.

2. Underlying Tables, Row Counts & Data Volume

1 Tables (1,000,000 rows • 45.8 MiB)

Production-scale fixtures loaded into the isolated DuckDB sandbox with at least 1,000,000 records per table:

📊 insurance_policy_bitemporal 1,000,000 rows 45.8 MiB Data Volume
policy_id (INTEGER) customer_id (INTEGER) deductible (DECIMAL(10,2)) valid_from (DATE) valid_to (DATE) system_from (TIMESTAMP) system_to (TIMESTAMP)
Data Preview (showing sample rows from 1,000,000 total rows):
# policy_id customer_id deductible valid_from valid_to system_from system_to
1 1 501 1,000 2026-01-01 00:00:00 2026-12-31 00:00:00 2026-01-01 00:00:00 2026-05-01 12:00:00
2 1 501 500 2026-04-01 00:00:00 2026-12-31 00:00:00 2026-05-01 12:00:00 9999-12-31 23:59:59
3 1 501 1,041.45 2026-01-01 00:00:00 2026-01-01 00:00:00 2026-03-01 09:30:00.000007 2026-03-01 09:30:00.000007
4 2 502 542.39 2026-01-02 00:00:00 2026-01-02 00:00:00 2026-03-01 09:30:00.000025 2026-03-01 09:30:00.000025
5 3 503 82.55 2026-01-03 00:00:00 2026-01-03 00:00:00 2026-03-01 09:30:00.000055 2026-03-01 09:30:00.000055
6 4 504 1,027.8 2026-01-04 00:00:00 2026-01-04 00:00:00 2026-03-01 09:30:00.000066 2026-03-01 09:30:00.000066
7 5 505 826.89 2026-01-05 00:00:00 2026-01-05 00:00:00 2026-03-01 09:30:00.000082 2026-03-01 09:30:00.000082
8 6 506 1,692.24 2026-01-06 00:00:00 2026-01-06 00:00:00 2026-03-01 09:30:00.000121 2026-03-01 09:30:00.000121
9 7 507 652.93 2026-01-07 00:00:00 2026-01-07 00:00:00 2026-03-01 09:30:00.000122 2026-03-01 09:30:00.000122
10 8 508 1,141.76 2026-01-08 00:00:00 2026-01-08 00:00:00 2026-03-01 09:30:00.000149 2026-03-01 09:30:00.000149
11 9 509 902.09 2026-01-09 00:00:00 2026-01-09 00:00:00 2026-03-01 09:30:00.000163 2026-03-01 09:30:00.000163
12 10 510 404.57 2026-01-10 00:00:00 2026-01-10 00:00:00 2026-03-01 09:30:00.000188 2026-03-01 09:30:00.000188
13 11 511 470.58 2026-01-11 00:00:00 2026-01-11 00:00:00 2026-03-01 09:30:00.000206 2026-03-01 09:30:00.000206
14 12 512 808.14 2026-01-12 00:00:00 2026-01-12 00:00:00 2026-03-01 09:30:00.000221 2026-03-01 09:30:00.000221
15 13 513 639.63 2026-01-13 00:00:00 2026-01-13 00:00:00 2026-03-01 09:30:00.000242 2026-03-01 09:30:00.000242

3. Graphical Query Execution Plan & Cost Bottlenecks

Physical Operator Tree (DuckDB 2.0 Profiler)

Visual flowchart of the physical execution pipeline. Operators with high relative costs (≥ 20% of query runtime or heavy latency) are visually highlighted:

Pipeline Latency Distribution (Total Plan Time: 0.13 ms) Nodes consuming ≥ 20% of query runtime are highlighted with glowing borders
📐 PROJECTION 10.3%
Latency: 0.01 ms
Rows In/Out: 1
Data Vol: 12 B
📁 Projections: ['__internal_decomp...
⏳ ORDER_BY 61.8%
Latency: 0.08 ms
Rows In/Out: 1
Data Vol: 9 B
📐 PROJECTION 2.3%
Latency: 0.00 ms
Rows In/Out: 1
Data Vol: 9 B
📁 Projections: ['__internal_compre...
🔍 TABLE_SCAN 25.6%
Latency: 0.03 ms
Rows In/Out: 1
Data Vol: 12 B
📁 memory.main.insurance_policy_bit...
Operator Cost % Latency Processed Rows Data Volume Details / Table Status
ORDER_BY 61.8% 0.08 ms 1 0.00 MB - Normal
TABLE_SCAN 25.6% 0.03 ms 1 0.00 MB memory.main.insurance_policy_bitemporal Normal
PROJECTION 10.3% 0.01 ms 1 0.00 MB Projections: ['__internal_decompress_integral_in Normal
PROJECTION 2.3% 0.00 ms 1 0.00 MB Projections: ['__internal_compress_integral_utin Normal

4. Queries Executed (Candidate vs Golden Ground Truth)

Beautified & Syntax Highlighted
Candidate SQL Executed by gemini-3.8-flash-low (Runtime on 1M Rows: 0.13 ms)
SELECT customer_id,
       deductible AS active_deductible
FROM insurance_policy_bitemporal
WHERE customer_id = 501 -- Business valid-time check as of 2026-04-10

  AND DATE '2026-04-10' >= valid_from
  AND DATE '2026-04-10' < valid_to -- System audit / transaction-time check as of 2026-04-15

  AND TIMESTAMP '2026-04-15 00:00:00' >= system_from
  AND TIMESTAMP '2026-04-15 00:00:00' < system_to
ORDER BY customer_id ASC;
Golden Reference Ground Truth SQL (Runtime on 1M Rows: 0.11 ms)
SELECT customer_id,
       deductible AS active_deductible
FROM insurance_policy_bitemporal
WHERE customer_id = 501 -- Business valid time: 2026-04-10

  AND DATE '2026-04-10' >= valid_from
  AND DATE '2026-04-10' < valid_to -- System knowledge time: 2026-04-15

  AND TIMESTAMP '2026-04-15 00:00:00' >= system_from
  AND TIMESTAMP '2026-04-15 00:00:00' < system_to
ORDER BY customer_id ASC;
DuckDB Fixture Setup DDL & Data Population
CREATE TABLE insurance_policy_bitemporal (policy_id INT, customer_id INT, deductible decimal(10, 2),
                                                                                     valid_from DATE, valid_to DATE, system_from TIMESTAMP, system_to TIMESTAMP);


INSERT INTO insurance_policy_bitemporal
VALUES -- Original policy entered on 2026-01-01 ($1000 deductible)
 (1, 501, 1000.00, '2026-01-01', '2026-12-31', '2026-01-01 00:00:00', '2026-05-01 12:00:00'),
 -- Retroactive change entered on 2026-05-01 backdating deductible to $500 effective from 2026-04-01
 (1, 501, 500.00, '2026-04-01', '2026-12-31', '2026-05-01 12:00:00', '9999-12-31 23:59:59');

5. Query Results & Expected Ground Truth

Tabular Comparison
Actual Candidate Output (1 rows × 2 cols)
# customer_id active_deductible
1 501 1,000
Expected Golden Output (1 rows × 2 cols)
# customer_id active_deductible
1 501 1,000
← Prev: Directed Dependency Graph... ⊞ Back to Benchmark Dashboard Next: Financial Ledger Running ... →